Why Human Proofreaders Continue to Outshine AI: The Art of Language and Nuance

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly prevalent in various aspects of our lives, including language-related tasks such as proofreading (and basic writing—we used it to create an outline for this post!). AI-driven proofreading tools do boast some impressive capabilities, from detecting basic grammatical errors to suggesting improvements in writing style. However, most journal publishers and schools are taking a hard line against the use of AI for writing and proofreading tasks related to academic output (e.g., journal manuscripts, theses and dissertations, and essays), and continuing to suggest that humans complete these tasks. There are a lot of good reasons for this.

First, human proofreaders possess a deep understanding of language that surpasses the capabilities of AI. Unlike machines, humans have the ability to interpret context, understand idiomatic expressions, and discern subtle nuances in tone and meaning. Language is inherently dynamic and nuanced, shaped by culture, context, and personal experience. Human proofreaders bring this nuanced understanding to their work, which enables them to make informed decisions about language usage, style, and tone that AI simply cannot replicate.

Moreover, human proofreaders offer a level of creativity and intuition that AI lacks. Language is not just a set of rules and patterns; it is a living, breathing entity that evolves over time. Human proofreaders have the ability to think creatively and adaptively, suggesting alternative phrasings, restructuring sentences for clarity, and ensuring appropriate tone. While AI may excel at identifying technical errors, it often falls short when it comes to capturing the artistry and subtlety of language.

Another key advantage of human proofreaders is their ability to empathize with the writer and understand their intentions. Effective communication goes beyond the mere transmission of information; it requires connection, and a genuine understanding of the audience. Human proofreaders take the time to consider the writer’s voice, audience, and objectives. They can offer valuable feedback and suggestions that resonate with the writer’s vision, helping to enhance the overall impact and effectiveness of the writing.

Furthermore, human proofreaders offer a level of judgment and discretion that AI lacks. Language is not always black and white; there are often shades of gray that require careful consideration and judgment. Human proofreaders can exercise discretion in their corrections, weighing factors such as style and context to make informed decisions about language usage. This ability to exercise judgment is particularly valuable in sensitive, unusual, or complex situations where rigid rules may not apply.

Finally, human proofreaders offer a personal touch that AI cannot replicate. Working with a human proofreader fosters a sense of collaboration and trust, allowing writers to engage in meaningful dialogue and exchange ideas. Humans can provide personalized feedback, answer questions, and offer guidance, creating a supportive environment for writers to grow and improve.

In conclusion, while AI-driven proofreading tools offer impressive capabilities, human proofreaders remain indispensable for their deep understanding of language, creativity, empathy, judgment, and personal touch. The art of language and nuance is a distinctly human domain, shaped by our unique capacity for interpretation, creativity, and empathy. As technology continues to advance, it is essential to recognize and celebrate the irreplaceable role that human proofreaders play in enhancing the clarity, effectiveness, and beauty of written communication.

A Guide to Key Terms in Journal Publishing

Introduction

In the vast ocean of academic knowledge, scholarly journals serve as lighthouses, guiding researchers through the tumultuous waves of information. Understanding key terms in journal publishing is essential for academics, students, and anyone interested in staying afloat in the sea of research. In this post, we will delve into three crucial concepts: peer review, impact factor, and open access.

Peer Review: The Guardian of Quality

Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing. Before an article is accepted for publication in a journal, it undergoes a rigorous evaluation process by experts in the field. These experts, known as peers, assess the manuscript’s quality, validity, and originality. These individuals essentially act as gatekeepers, ensuring that only high-quality research reaches the academic community.

The peer-review process typically involves multiple rounds of evaluation. Authors submit their manuscripts to a journal, and the editor assigns the paper to qualified reviewers. These reviewers scrutinize the research methodology, data analysis, and conclusions. They provide constructive feedback and recommendations to the authors where needed, which helps to improve the paper’s overall quality.

While peer review is a cornerstone of scholarly integrity, it is not without challenges. For example, the process can be time-consuming and subjective. However, the benefits of peer review, such as filtering out unreliable research and maintaining academic standards, far outweigh the drawbacks.

Impact Factor: A Metric for Journal Prestige

The impact factor is a quantitative measure of a journal’s influence within the academic community. Calculated annually (with several updates having been made to the ranking process for 2024), the impact factor reflects the average number of citations received by articles published in a journal over a specific period. Journals with higher impact factors are often considered more prestigious and influential in their respective fields.

Authors often aspire to publish their work in journals with high impact factors, as this can enhance the visibility and credibility of their research. However, impact factors should not be the sole criterion for evaluating the quality of a journal or its articles; it represents just one of many factors to consider, and its significance may vary across disciplines.

Open Access: Breaking Down Paywalls

In recent years, the concept of open access has gained momentum in the world of scholarly publishing. Open-access journals make research freely available to the public, eliminating traditional subscription barriers. This model promotes the democratization of knowledge, allowing a broader audience to access and engage with scholarly content.

While open access has numerous advantages, including increased visibility and accessibility, it also poses financial challenges for publishers. Finding sustainable funding models that balance the need for open access with the costs of publication remains a critical issue in the academic publishing landscape.

Conclusion

Navigating the intricate waters of journal publishing requires a solid understanding of key terms such as peer review, impact factor, and open access. Peer review ensures the reliability and quality of published research, while the impact factor provides a quantitative measure of a journal’s prestige. Finally, embracing open access enhances the dissemination of knowledge but presents financial challenges for publishers.

As we continue to sail through the ever-evolving ocean of scholarly communication, staying informed about these key terms empowers researchers and readers alike. By understanding the intricacies of journal publishing, we can contribute to a more transparent, accessible, and robust academic ecosystem.

Navigating Success: The Crucial Role of Networking in Academia

In the dynamic realm of academia, where knowledge and ideas flourish, networking is a cornerstone of professional development. Beyond the lecture halls and research laboratories, connecting with peers, mentors, and experts holds immense value. This post highlights just some of the reasons why networking is vital, and how it can shape not only your academic journey but also your future career.

Knowledge Exchange and Collaboration

Networking in the academic world entails more than just exchanging business cards; it’s about exchanging ideas, perspectives, and insights. Engaging with fellow scholars, attending conferences, and participating in seminars open doors to diverse viewpoints, sparking intellectual discourse that can drive innovation and breakthroughs in your field. Collaborative research projects often spring from chance encounters, leading to interdisciplinary solutions that may not have been possible in isolation.

Mentorship and Guidance

Navigating academia can be complex, especially for those just starting out. Establishing connections with experienced individuals can provide a channel for invaluable guidance. Mentors offer insights on research methodologies, publication strategies, and career choices, helping you make informed decisions. Their mentorship can significantly impact your academic trajectory, accelerating your learning curve and personal growth.

Access to Resources

Networking extends beyond human connections; it grants access to resources that can bolster your academic pursuits. Through networking, you might gain access to exclusive research databases, funding opportunities, specialized workshops, and cutting-edge technologies. Collaborative projects can also result in shared access to equipment, reducing the financial burden on individual researchers.

Exposure to Different Perspectives

Academia thrives on diversity—of ideas, perspectives, and cultural backgrounds. Networking exposes you to scholars from around the world, enriching your understanding of various viewpoints. This exposure fosters cultural competence and equips you to address global challenges through a well-rounded lens.

Conference and Seminar Participation

Conferences and seminars are hubs of intellectual exchange, drawing experts and enthusiasts from various fields. Participating in these events not only allows you to present your research but also offers opportunities to engage in discussions, receive feedback, and forge connections with fellow attendees. These interactions can result in collaborations, joint publications, and lasting friendships.

Career Advancement

Networking is a powerful catalyst for career progression. Well-connected academics are often able to stay abreast of job openings, research positions, and funding opportunities that have not been widely advertised. Personal recommendations from within your network can carry significant weight in selection processes. Additionally, building a reputable online presence through platforms such as LinkedIn can enhance your visibility and attract potential employers or collaborators.

Staying Abreast of Trends

Academic disciplines are in constant flux, with new research, methodologies, and technologies emerging regularly. Networking keeps you up to date with the latest trends and advancements. By engaging in conversations with experts, you can gain insights into emerging research areas, technological innovations, and novel approaches that could influence your work.

Final Thoughts

Networking in academia is more than a social activity; it’s a strategic investment in your personal and professional growth. By fostering connections with peers, mentors, and experts, you open doors to collaboration, mentorship, and resource-sharing that can shape the trajectory of your academic journey. The benefits of networking extend beyond the academic realm, positively influencing your career prospects and enriching your understanding of the broader intellectual landscape. So, as you navigate the world of academia, remember that the bridges you build today can lead to the discoveries and opportunities of tomorrow.

A Crash Course in APA Style: Getting to Know the Basics

The style of the American Psychological Association (APA) is one of the most widely used across academia, particularly in the social sciences, psychology, education, and related fields. Many top-ranked business and management journals also use APA. The style covers citation and referencing; paper structure; formatting of headings, tables, and other document elements; and so on. This blog post outlines the key elements of APA style—though it should be noted that many journals (e.g., those published by the Academy of Management) use their own style based on APA.

The Basics of APA Style

  1. Title Page: The title page includes—you guessed it—the title of the paper, the author name(s), the institutional affiliation, and a running head. The running head is a short version of the paper’s title and is also included on each subsequent pages in the header section of the document.
  2. Abstract: The abstract summarizes the paper’s main points, including the research objectives, methodology or approach, results, and conclusions. It typically ranges from 100 to 250 words.
  3. In-text citations: APA style uses an author–date citation system. This means that when sources are cited within the text, the author’s last name and the publication year are included in parentheses—for example, “(Smith, 2023)” or “Smith (2023)” (depending on the sentence structure). Page numbers should also be included when using a direct quotation—so “(Smith, 2020, p. 45).”
  4. References: The reference list should include all sources cited in the paper (and none that are not directly cited). The information to be included varies according to the publication type, but, broadly speaking, each entry includes the author’s name, publication year, title, and publication information (e.g., journal title, and volume, issue, and page numbers for journal entries; or publisher for books). The reference page is organized alphabetically by the author’s last name.
  5. Headings: APA style employs a hierarchical system of headings to organize content, ranging from level 1 (main section headings) to level 5 (subheadings). This aids in presenting a clear structure and enhancing the readability of the document.
  6. Font and formatting: APA recommends using a clear and legible font, such as Times New Roman, with 12 pt. font size. Double-spacing should be used throughout the paper, including the title page, abstract, main text, and references.

Why APA Style Matters

Consistency: APA provides a standardized format for citations and references, ensuring that your sources are attributed correctly and uniformly. It also provide recommendations on spellings and word presentation (e.g., use of hyphens, capitalization). This consistency lends credibility to your work, allows readers to easily locate and verify the sources you’ve used, and ensures your work conforms to academic standards.

Clarity: The structured organization of APA style, including headings and subheadings, enhances the clarity of your writing. It helps readers follow your arguments and navigate through complex topics.

Academic integrity: Properly citing sources is a matter of academic integrity. APA style emphasizes giving credit to the original authors and researchers, preventing plagiarism and upholding ethical writing practices. APA also provide recommendations on language use (e.g., avoiding the use of “minorities” to describe people of color and other underrepresented groups), which can help you avoid using outdated terminology.

Professionalism: When you apply APA style to your writing, you demonstrate a commitment to professionalism and scholarly rigor. This is especially important in academic and professional contexts where adherence to standards is highly valued.

Mastering the intricacies of APA style is a valuable skill for any writer engaged in academic or research-oriented work. It is used by some of the highest-ranked journals, and its guidelines provide a structure that promotes clarity, consistency, and proper attribution of sources.

And remember, if you’re in any doubt, we can help. Our editors are experts in applying APA style in particular, and are up to date on all the changes brought in with the seventh edition. Plus, application of style guidelines is included in all orders—just provide the name of your journal or a relevant link or style document when you send your work over, and we’ll make sure your work is compliant.

How to Choose the Right Topic for Your Dissertation

For a PhD candidate, little is more daunting than choosing a topic for your dissertation. After all, it will shape the kind of research you’ll be doing over the next four-plus years of your life. And not only will your dissertation take up a lot of time and energy—it may also have a strong influence on whether you get hired down the road.

Choosing the right dissertation topic is vital to get the most of your PhD experience and to best serve your career. Here are five steps to ensure you’re on the right track.

1. Make sure the topic matches your career goals

No matter how well-crafted and compelling your dissertation is, it’s going to be of little value to you it doesn’t match up with your career goals. Make sure that you choose a topic that you want to continue researching in the future and that’s within the field you want to teach.

It’s also not a bad idea to tailor your topic to the market. Ideally, you’ll be defending your dissertation with plenty of prestigious journal publications under your belt already––plus, focusing on a current, relevant topic will make it easier to find grants to fund your research throughout your PhD and beyond.

2. Choose a topic that’s just right

Many PhD candidates struggle with fine-tuning the scope of their dissertation topic. It should be neither too broad nor too narrow, but just right––a tricky balance to strike. Most often, academics fall into this trap of either broadness or narrowness: while some fail to pinpoint a specific topic and end up floundering in the vastness of their research, others overcorrect, narrowing down their focus until they’ve missed the big picture altogether.

While your topic certainly needs to be specific, remember that a robust dissertation subject also needs a bit of breathing room and some space for growth and flexibility. This is especially true in the early stages of researching and writing, when your topic is still liable to fluctuate and change.

3. Double-check that the research is feasible

Before you commit to a research topic, it’s important to ensure that it’s actually feasible in terms of budget, resources, and scope. How many research participants can you really expect to find? Does your budget better accommodate quantitative or qualitative data? Given your time constraints, does it make sense to conduct a longitudinal study, or would a cross-sectional study be more practical? Will you have the resources to travel, or should you keep it local? Don’t set your heart on a project that simply won’t be possible to execute.

You also need to be realistic about your own knowledge and expertise, since you’re not going to have time to learn a new skill on the job. For example, you may be itching to study Medieval manuscripts in your dissertation––but if you aren’t fluent in Middle English, you should likely consider a different field of study. 

4. Listen to your supervisor’s advice

Your supervisor is an invaluable resource when choosing your PhD topic. Not only can they give you useful tips about the job market and resources available in your field, they can also help you assess where your topic stands with respect to the three items above (career, scope, and feasibility).

Even if you don’t like what your supervisor has to say, it’s a good idea to hear them out. Chances are they’ve seen a lot of dissertations in their time and know what separates the success stories from the flops.

5. Study something you’re genuinely interested in

While choosing a dissertation topic can be stressful, the good news is that if you do it right, you can spend four-plus years studying what you genuinely love.

In fact, not only can you choose a topic you’re passionate about, it’s actually in your best interests to do exactly that. After all, if you truly care about your work, you’re more likely to go above and beyond to ensure that it’s thoroughly researched, clearly communicated, and carefully polished––and, ultimately, to produce a successful dissertation.

Five Tips for Choosing an Academic Advisor

When starting your PhD program, you may feel so overwhelmed with the stresses of researching, taking classes, teaching, and drafting your dissertation proposal that you don’t spend much time thinking about who to choose as an academic advisor. This is a mistake: along with your dissertation topic, your academic advisor can be one of the most significant choices you make during the program and can significantly affect the success of your PhD.

Your academic advisor serves plenty of useful functions: they help you secure funding, give feedback on your writing and research, support and vouch for your work, and offer invaluable advice for your career going forward. Here are five tips to help you when selecting an academic advisor.

1. Ask other professors for guidance

If you’re not sure where to begin when choosing an academic advisor, make an appointment with your program director or another trusted professor in the program. They’ll be able to point you in the direction of viable academic advisors conducting research in your field, and will have helpful insider knowledge on the professor’s work and communication habits. Plus, they might be willing to warn you of any red flags––for example, if a certain professor’s PhD students have a high dropout rate––and steer you in the right direction.

2. Bear in mind that the “best” professor isn’t always be the best advisor

Many students fall into the trap of assuming that the “best” professor––the hotshot bestselling author or public intellectual––will also be the best advisor. However, the opposite is often true.

Yes, studying under a professor with critical acclaim and status might help you get your foot in a few doors during the start of your career. But a high-profile advisor might not have enough time to properly support you in your work, leaving you directionless and waiting weeks for a reply. Ultimately, you’re probably better off with a more modest choice, one who offers something even better than a flashy name: their time.

3. Look to later-career professors where possible

 While assistant and adjunct professors can be just as smart and helpful as their tenured counterparts––not to mention that their research can be even more current and relevant––they are often not ideal as academic advisors. Professors with less secure positions often have more work on the go and less time to help you out. They will also likely have less access to resources and funding opportunities than their tenured peers, and their research interests will be less specialized.

On the other hand, a later-career professor will have the tools and experience to properly support you in your work. They’ll also likely be more willing to invest time in shaping your career, since they don’t need to worry so much about their own.

4. Get in touch

Once you’ve selected a potential advisor, don’t wait too long before getting in touch. Send a quick email to find out whether they currently have the capacity to take on more PhD students, as well as to ask about their ongoing research and confirm that it matches your own interests. That way, you’ll know right off the bat whether they’re a viable option, or if you should keep looking.

That being said, don’t be concerned if they don’t respond right away. Professors have busy schedules and are fielding mountains of emails, so be patient.

5. Meet in person

While email is sufficient for making initial contact with prospective academic advisors, once you’ve settled on one it’s time for an in-person meeting. After all, you’re going to have to work with this person for the next four-plus years, so you need to make sure you get along and are on the same page in terms of your research goals, vision, and timeline. It’s also important to ensure that your advisor is a good communicator, is willing to be flexible about scheduling and deadlines, and understands the importance of work–life balance.

4 Tips for Spotting “Predatory” Scholarly Journals

Over the last few decades there’s been a spike in predatory academic journals. These journals often accept every article submitted to them as long as the author can pay the exorbitant publication fee—which the journal takes without offering peer review or other services in exchange. The sole aim of predatory journals is to make a profit, which they do by preying on unsuspecting academics. As PhD programs grow increasingly competitive, students become easier targets; many are desperate for publication and will gratefully publish their work anywhere that will accept it.

Until recently, emerging scholars could deduce which journals were legitimate and which were scams using Beall’s List. Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado, curated and maintained this list of predatory open-access publishers for nearly a decade before shutting it down in 2017 due to frequent complaints and defamation suits. Interested or concerned academics can still access an archived version of Beall’s List, but it is no longer being updated.

There remain many useful resources that can help guide academics toward reputable journals, such as the Directory of Open Access Journals. Here are four more tips on how to steer clear of predatory publications when trying to find a home for your paper.

 

1. Pricey publication fees

One of the quickest ways to spot a predatory journal is by its gratuitous publication fee. Predatory journals are more interested in taking your money than in publishing valuable information. While many journals do charge legitimate publication fees in order to keep articles open access or to fund expensive peer review and article preparation processes, journals that do not offer these services—meaning that they are not open-access or don’t review your work—charge this fee for the sole reason of making a profit. Journals that ask for unreasonably high publication fees are thus unlikely to be reputable.

Another red flag is if the journal requires you to pay a submission fee. Most journals that charge a publication fee only ask for this after your paper has been accepted, pending revision and peer review. If you have to pay just to submit a paper, it’s probably not worth the cost.

 

2. Unprofessional presentation

Usually, you can tell intuitively if an academic journal is a scam. You’re best off avoiding journals with clear grammatical errors, typos, or inconsistent formatting, as well as those with unprofessional websites. If the journal’s appearance isn’t up to par, chances are that its editorial standards fall short as well.

 

3. Unlisted or small editorial board

Avoid journals that obscure or omit information regarding their editorial board. Reputable scholarly journals should have a large editorial board composed of respected academics, as well as a transparent editing process. Moreover, you likely want to know who will be reviewing, editing, and overseeing the publication of your paper—after all, you worked hard on it. A reputable journal has nothing to hide, so if you can’t find any information on, say, a journal’s editor-in-chief, take that as a clear warning sign that it might not be a trustworthy publication.

 

4. Misleading location

Often, predatory journals deliberately mislead readers as to where they are based. For example, many such journals use words such as “American” or “international” in their titles to add a sense of prestige, even if their headquarters are not in America, or if they aren’t international publications. Check where the journal is based before you submit your work and ensure that their branding reflects their true location. Again, good journals should have nothing to hide.

Strengthening your Academic Writing: How to Evaluate Your Sources for Relevance, Reliability, and Rigor

Evaluating your sources is an important part of academic writing. If your sources are trustworthy, accurate, and unbiased, your paper will be much stronger. Your sources should also be relevant to the topic you are writing about.

Is your source relevant?

Before evaluating the reliability of your source, you should decide whether the source is relevant. You don’t have to read the entire document to be able to tell if the source will complement your own work—there are several aspects you can use as starting points to help you assess its relevance.

Keywords

Keywords tell you the main topics of a book or an article. You can use these to quickly determine whether the source discusses your topic to a useful extent.

Abstracts

Journal articles typically have abstracts, which are concise descriptions of the paper’s content. Reading an abstract should give you a good indication of whether the source will be relevant for your paper.

Introduction and Conclusion

The introduction to a book or article usually contains a summary of the work. This will be more detailed than an abstract and can help determine relevance. Conclusions function similarly, summarizing the work and its findings.

Is your source reliable and rigorous?

It is important to choose trustworthy sources. You want to ensure your paper is well-researched, with appropriate citations, and is based on accurate, up-to-date information. With the advent of the Internet anyone can publish anything, so it is important to evaluate each source you are considering using. There are many ways to evaluate reliability.

Reputability

You can evaluate reputability in several ways. Is the publisher or journal well-known and reputable? Has the source undergone a peer-review process? Is the scholar established? What is the journal’s impact factor? Self-published and open-access sources can be tricky in this regard. It is important to carefully examine these works before you use them, particularly if the publisher or author is not yet well-established. That’s not to say that open-access sources can’t provide useful information, but you must vet lesser-known journals and self-published authors by looking at criteria like the following when making your decision.

Is the source current?

Certain fields of scholarship change quickly and information can become outdated. This is particularly true in the sciences. Before using a source, make sure that the information in it is still relevant in your field.

Does the source use citations to back up the claims it makes?

If a source has no citations, it is likely to be unreliable. Unless the work is an opinion piece—and this should be clearly expressed in the text itself—you should always be able to go back and check the information it gives. Similarly, if the source you are evaluating has been cited many times by other authors, this is a good sign that it is reliable. You can check how many times a source has been cited and who has cited it using Google Scholar.

Reviews

Have other scholars reviewed the source? Reviews can tell you whether a source is scholarly and has been accepted in its field of research. If reviews are bad, you may not want to use the source in your paper.

Considerations for Internet Sources

Internet sources can be difficult to evaluate. In addition to the criteria above, you’ll want to check whether the source is grammatically correct and uses language that is not inflammatory, derogatory, or overly biased. Additionally, you will want to find who is responsible for the online material and determine whether they are an established scholar or organization, or if the material is sponsored by someone with a vested interest. Wikipedia should almost never be used in academic writing, since the information can be amended by anyone and is therefore notoriously unreliable.

How to Write More Concisely

Most journals, and even dissertation and thesis guidelines, have word limits in place to ensure that papers are digestible. However, good academic writing needs to be concise not just to meet those limits but also to ensure that readers can understand the complex topic at hand, and that your argument is coherent and not muddied by lots of extraneous information. Removing unnecessary words and complicated phrases will make your writing much stronger. This post offers some ways in which you can tighten up your writing to produce clearer content and more easily adhere to word count restrictions.

Remove inflated phrases

An inflated phrase is one that uses more words than necessary to convey the sense and idea. Inflated phrases can add many words to your writing, so removing them can reduce your word count significantly. Here are some examples:

   Inflated: This paper seeks to examine…

   Concise: This paper examines… (note that this is also more accurate, since the paper actually does examine the issue in question, rather than just seeking to do so).

   Inflated: …were of the opinion…

   Concise: …stated…

Once you start to identify inflated phrases, you will start to notice them everywhere. These phrases can be easily replaced by shorter ones that will save you some valuable writing space.

Avoid passive voice

Avoiding passive voice in your writing as much as possible will make your sentences more concise and clearer. This does not mean passive voice is wrong—passive voice is often necessary and helpful, particularly in scientific writing, and in fact there are occasions when passive voice makes for a clearer sentence than active voice. Using the passive voice too often, however, can make your writing unnecessarily wordy and difficult to understand.

   Passive: The interviews were conducted by three trained researchers.

   Active: Three trained researchers conducted the interviews.

   Passive: New findings were revealed by the study.

   Active: The study revealed new findings.

Remove redundancies

Text is redundant when it expresses the same idea twice. This often happens when you use words or phrases where the meaning of one of the words is already implied in the other. For example, cooperation implies working together, so the phrase “cooperating together” suffers from redundancy and you could simply use “cooperate.”

Here are two more examples:

   Redundant: In addition, we also conducted surveys.

   Concise: In addition, we conducted surveys. (Or: We also conducted surveys.)

   Redundant: We reviewed literature by knowledgeable experts in the field of management.

   Concise: We reviewed literature by experts in the field of management.

Make sure each word is necessary

If you need to cut some words, look at each part of your sentence. Is it necessary? Does it enhance your writing? Long sentences are good candidates for revision. They often contain many extra words that do not contribute to the overall meaning.

   Unnecessarily Long: Based on the results of the survey, we came to the conclusion of that most of the employees preferred working in the office rather than working from home.

   Concise: The survey results revealed that most employees preferred working from the office rather than from home.

Hopefully, these tips will enable you to stick to your word count and become a better writer. However, there are times when your draft is so far over the word limit that cutting it down sufficiently feels like an impossible task. That’s where we can take an objective view and help you meet even the tightest word limit. In fact, we relish the challenge of word count reductions and would love to help you!

How to Incorporate Quotations into Your Writing

Incorporating the ideas of others into your paper is a key part of academic writing. Quotations help to make your own writing stronger, show that you have read widely and intelligently on your topic, and demonstrate that your arguments can be backed up with findings from other studies. Whenever you use someone else’s exact words, this is a direct quote; if you paraphrase or otherwise incorporate someone else’s ideas or findings without using their own words, it’s known as an indirect quote.

When incorporating direct quotes from others into your work, you will need to indicate the quotations clearly (via quotation marks or, particularly in the case of longer quotes, as a separate block of text), credit the original author (through an appropriate citation presented according to the style guidelines you are using), and copy the text verbatim (or indicate clearly where you have made changes, for example using ellipses or square brackets—see below).

Quotations should not be dropped into your text as stand-alone sentences. Good academic writing thoughtfully integrates quotes to support the argument and help your reader to understand why you are using the quote, and the relevance it has to your work.

In this post, we’ll use some text taken from Barbara M. Wildemuth’s Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science to show how to incorporate a quotation in three different ways.

Full grammatical integration into your sentence

If you just want to use shorter phrases from another source, grammatically integrating the quotation into your sentence is a good choice. If the quote does not quite fit your sentence grammatically, you can modify it to fit your sentence as long as you do not change the meaning. If you delete part of the text, you can show this using an ellipsis. If you change a word so that it fits grammatically, under most style guides you will signal this using square brackets.

Here is an example:

With respect to the research process, Wildemuth (2009, p. 11) stated that it is crucial to “define [an appropriate] research question.”

Integration through an introductory sentence

Another way to incorporate a quotation is to introduce it using a full sentence that describes or interprets the quotation.

Wildemuth (2009, p. 11) suggested that developing a research question is the key to a successful project: “Having a clear statement of your research question in hand allows you to design your study (including your overall strategy and your specific data collection procedures).”

Integration through a brief introduction

Finally, you can integrate a quotation by briefly introducing it. This puts the focus on the quotation rather than on your interpretation.

Wildemuth (2009, p. 11) wrote, “The first […] step in conducting a research study is to define your research question.”

However, your next sentence would probably need to make clear why this quotation is relevant to your context.

You can use the methods above to integrate quotations in any style (e.g., APA, Chicago, Harvard, etc.), but the citation format and location in the sentence will vary according to the style you are following.

One final note: Although quotations are vital for providing readers with evidence for the validity of your claim, it’s important to strike a balance between your own words and the words of others. Be thoughtful in deciding when to quote and when to paraphrase, making sure your voice comes through strongly in your paper. And when in doubt, send your paper to us. We’ll make sure quotations are appropriate, relevant, and have been cited adequately. We’ll also ensure the relevant style guide has been correctly applied.

Works Cited

Wildemuth, Barbara M. 2009. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.